| Evaluator Name: |
|
Home Phone:
|
(
)
-
Ext:
|
Ministry/Church: |
|
Position: |
|
Address:
|
|
City:
|
|
State:
|
|
Postal
Zip Code:
|
|
E-Mail
Address:
|
|
Date:
|
|
How long have you known the applicant? Does the applicant have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ? Is the applicant’s lifestyle consistent with Biblical Standards?
|
Please describe the ministry the applicant was involved in and how you and the applicant interacted as well as how long you were together.
|
Describe the two strengths of the applicant, and the areas where the applicant struggles and how this has been demonstrated.
|
How well does the applicant interact with people?
|
How well does the applicant adapt to the unpredictable and changing situations?
|
Would you say the applicant works better in a team or independently? Please provide evidence.
|
How does the applicant relate to authority? How does the applicant handle conflict with authority?
|
How does the applicant handle conflict with co-workers?
|
Describe a situation which would characterize the applicant well. Provide the background of the situation and what the applicant did, and how the applicant impacted the outcome of the situation.
|
How do you rate the applicant’s possible success in foreign mission service?
|
Through your observation, please describe the area that the candidate needs to be improved.
|
|
|
|
| Please rate each of the following areas by checking one choice which best describes the Applicant: |
Initiative:
|
self starter, oversees issues
minimum supervision needed
puts good effort into work, meets standards
shows minimal interest, requires supervision
other:
|
Dependability:
|
very reliable, always follows instructions
reliable, little supervision needed
requires more supervision and follow-up than most other workers
doesn’t follow instructions accurately, could be careless
other:
|
Cooperativeness: |
an excellent team worker, harmonious
most relations with others are normally harmonious
difficult to work with at times, sometimes antagonizes others
frequently quarrelsome and causes friction
other:
|
Judgement:
|
develops creative alternatives and makes good decisions
good methodical thought process, good problem solving ability
lacks confidence to make routine decisions, seeks help often
demonstrates inability to cope on the job
other:
|
Leadership style:
|
high desire for achievement, sets an example that others follow
sets good example, usually calm and tactful
willing to lead, but sometimes tactless, difficult to accept criticism
unwilling to lead, prefers to follow
other:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|